UPDATE MARCH 9, 2016-
On March 8, 2016, the Wynn filed a request for panel rehearing as well as en banc (larger panel of judges) rehearing. In these requests, the Wynn is asking the Court to overturn its February 23, 2016 decision. This is the Wynn's first of two "appeals" steps it can take. If these requests for rehearing are denied, the Wynn's last "appeal" step is to seek review of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' decision by the United States Supreme Court. Each of these "appeals" steps are by permission only-- that is, Wynn does not get to have the decision reviewed on appeal as of right-- the courts must agree to review the decision. The attorneys for the dealers (our office) will be notified by the Court if it wishes for us to respond to Wynn's rehearing requests. The Court may not seek a response from plaintiffs and can simply deny the requests outright. If the Court decides to entertain the Wynn's requests for rehearing, it will give the plaintiffs' attorneys an opportunity to submit a response to the requests. We will be updating this website when we have more information from the Court.
UPDATE FEBRUARY 29, 2016-
RE: QUESTIONS WE HAVE RECEIVED FROM CURRENT AND FORMER WYNN DEALERS:
We have been asked about what the Wynn's further appeal options are. We believe the Wynn is likely to request "rehearing" of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decision. This means the Wynn will either ask the panel of judges who issued the 2/23/16 decision to reverse that decision, or it will seek review of that decision by the En Banc Court (larger panel of judges).
The time for the Wynn to request rehearing is 17 days after the prior decision was issued. Therefore, absent any request for an extension of time to file that petition for rehearing, the Wynn must make its request to the Court by MARCH 11, 2016.
We will update this website as soon as we are informed about whether the Wynn will be requesting rehearing of the February 23, 2016 decision.
UPDATE FEBRUARY 23, 2016 - UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT RULES IN FAVOR OF THE WYNN DEALERS! You can read the decision HERE
This is a great victory for the Wynn dealers. Unless overturned by further appeals (which the Wynn Casino is expected to attempt) it is hoped that this decision will require the trial court to Order the Wynn casino to return to the Wynn dealers who have joined this lawsuit the tips taken from their toke pool (but only starting in May of 2011, at the earliest, and only for the dealers who have joined the lawsuit) and given to the Wynn's floor supervisors.
If you have not already joined this case and worked for the Wynn Casino (including Encore) as a dealer within the past three years you can download the forms that must be filled out to join the case by clicking HERE.
UPDATE: JANUARY 30, 2013 -
IN JANUARY 2013 A NEW LAWSUIT UNDER THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT (THE FEDERAL LAW "FLSA') WAS FILED AGAINST THE WYNN CASINO. THIS NEW CASE CAN ONLY BENEFIT DEALERS WORKING AFTER MAY 4, 2011. IT DOES NOT REPLACE THE FIRST LAWSUIT, UNDER NEVADA STATE LAW, AGAINST WYNN WHICH IS CURRENTLY ON APPEAL. IT IS INTENDED TO PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL REMEDY FOR DEALERS WHO HAVE JOINED THAT LAWSUIT FOR THE TIME AFTER MAY 4, 2011.
PLEASE VISIT OUR "WHAT YOU CAN DO!" PAGE FOR AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE FROM LEON GREENBERG TO ALL WYNN DEALERS
IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS PLEASE SEND US AN EMAIL FROM OUR "CONTACT US" PAGE
FOR MORE INFORMATION ON LEON GREENBERG AND HIS FIRM, VISIT HIS WEBSITE WWW.OVERTIMELAW.COM
WYNN AND ENCORE DEALERS WEBSITE
UPDATE SEPTEMBER 9, 2016
The Wynn has requested a "stay" of the Ninth Circuit's decision pending a response from the U.S. Supreme Court on the petition for review by that Court. This means the Wynn is asking the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to hold off on sending this case back to the District Court for further proceedings until the parties are informed whether or not the Supreme Court will take up Wynn's appeal request. The Ninth Circuit Court of appeals has granted the Wynn's stay request, so this case will remain on hold with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals until the Supreme Court issues a determination on accepting an appeal. We do not expect to hear anything from the U.S. Supreme Court until 2017, so we anticipate this case will remain "stayed" with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals until at least the first or second quarter of 2017. Please check back here frequently for updates.
UPDATE SEPTEMBER 6, 2016
We have received another small victory in this case! On September 6, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision which DENIED ORLA's (see below update from 4/12/16 for explanation) petition for rehearing from the full court. This decision also applies to the Wynn's appeal.
WHAT THIS MEANS:
This decision means the District Court's order dismissing our case against the Wynn is reversed. Unless the United States Supreme Court accepts the Wynn's (or ORLA's) petition to review the 9th Circuit's decision (this is done only by permission of the Court, not as of right), the Wynn will have run out of appeal options and must proceed with the case back in the District Court. We do not know when the U.S. Supreme Court will act on the Wynn's petition, and it may be some time before we hear anything. Please continue to check back here frequently for all updates on this case.
UPDATE APRIL 12, 2016
The case against the Wynn is currently stayed (or being held) in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals pending a decision by that Court in a separate matter. When the dealers appealed their case, that appeal was joined with another case on appeal that was raising the same issue- whether the U.S. Dept. of Labor's ("U.S. DOL") regulations concerning tip pooling policies were valid. The parties in that separate case were the Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association ("ORLA") and the U.S. DOL. Although the Court of Appeals denied the Wynn's petition for rehearing on April 1, 2016, the Court has asked for briefing on ORLA's petition for rehearing. This means the U.S. DOL will have to submit a written brief to the Court of Appeals explaining why the Court should not rehear or reconsider its prior decision.
What this tells us:
1) We have no explanation on why the Court requested briefing on ORLA's petition but denied Wynn's petition outright;
2) We do not know whether this means the Court of Appeals will reverse its own decision that it issued on February 23, 2016 which ruled in favor of the dealers;
3) We do not know when the Court of Appeals will inform us of whether they will grant ORLA's petition for rehearing or not;
4) No action will be taken in our case, nor will our case be sent back to the District Court for further proceedings, until ORLA's petition for rehearing is resolved.
Even if the Court of Appeals denies ORLA's petition for rehearing, we fully expect that the Wynn will seek review of the February 23, 2016 decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. Wynn will have 90 days to request review by the U.S. Supreme Court, but the clock on that 90 days will not start running until our case is returned from the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals back to the District Court.
AT THIS POINT, THIS IS ALL WE KNOW. PLEASE CHECK THIS WEBSITE FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. WE WILL UPDATE THIS WEBSITE AS WE GET INFORMATION.
UPDATE APRIL 1, 2016
ONE MORE ADDITIONAL VICTORY FOR THE WYNN AND ENCORE DEALERS!!!!
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has DENIED the Wynn's request to reconsider the February 23, 2016 decision which found in favor of the dealers. The Court denied the Wynn's request to have the three judge panel reconsider their decision as well as the Wynn's request to have the En Banc Court (larger panel of judges) reconsider the decision. This means the decision will stand in favor of the dealers unless the Wynn can convince the United States Supreme Court to review that February 23, 2016 decision and overturn in. Review by the U.S. Supreme Court is only by permission- the Wynn does not have a "right" to have an automatic review by the U.S. Supreme Court. If the Wynn seeks review by the U.S. Supreme Court, and that request is denied, the Wynn will have exhausted all of its "appeal" options. Please continue to check this website for further updates on the status of this case. This is another significant victory for the dealers!!
Copyright © LEON GREENBERG. All rights reserved.